Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GrumpyGus who wrote (4613)	2/27/2016 2:02:32 PM
From: Zengold	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

Seems ole Nuc is calling your drilling post pure bullshit...its all about trenching and inferred bs! No need for anyone to actually quantify or qualify what left in the played out quarry!modelling of an inferred Resource so much for proven! It's too bad most people don't have a clue how geostatistics is applied to resource definition and why it plays a key role in the modelling of an inferred resource at Miller. "It seems everybody is focused on drilling vs trenching correlated to geophysics when in fact the thing that ties it all together is geostatistic analysis. Much of this flies well above SI posters heads which is evidenced by the dialogue taking place on resource definition ............ a number of Canada Carbon investors also appear lacking in understanding on how a resource within the Miller deposition domain can be quantified with the current level of drilling and trenching. Aiming the drill to hit vein foot for foot is not the sole driver to quantification. " I did love your partial drill results you posted.....reminds me of a gold mine that only published the core results from the few and far in between high grade hole so try to ...what did purcell call it? Your post only confirms what some of us already know about Miller.....run....forest.....run....as far a way as you can!