SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GrumpyGus who wrote (4621)2/27/2016 4:11:06 PM
From: allliesRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 12350
 
I am fine with ZEN because of their already report resource, cost, viability. You have NONE of that so far with CCB. Very big difference here and a very big gap in reports. Oh and releasing drill results early has nothing to do with not having any questions later.....common honestly give your head a shake. Irrelevant.

Again, please comment on the following:
Please explain to me this: Back in school, when you knew you would be in big trouble if you did bad on your grades (and would be rewarded if you did good), and you get marks throughout the year that turn out to be bad, do you go ahead and tell your parents right away that you are doing bad or do you try to avoid them at all cost until you HAVE to tell them (IE the official report, your report card, is out and it needs to be signed), very simple concept right, you want to defer the trouble you will be in until the last possible moment to try and squeeze out as much from your parents as you can. Now please explain how choosing to not report the drill results until the PEA is good in any way? Please explain that to me. When you know you catalyst will be the resource amount (because the quality is good - although not yet determined on consistent large random samples yet), why wouldn't you release it as soon as possible if it was good, why wouldn't you because you would make so much more money, this stock would be flying if they released good resource figures........yet they still want to wait until the last possible moment.


I do not want your reasoning why you think they are delaying. Does the situation above not make sense, that you would not want to report bad results early if you could.



To: GrumpyGus who wrote (4621)2/27/2016 4:43:40 PM
From: JayfishRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 12350
 
Gus
I hope my replys to your messages have been civil I do believe I have avoided name calling and derogatory comments.

The problem I have with CCB posters is they assume there will be an economic resource when there has been no evidence what so ever to suggest there is one.
I can't take an abandoned property and say there must be more just because it once produced a mineral.

In fact the Miller mine has had very little historical information to allow any studies to be made . I think one newspaper report showed only 40 railcars in total were reported before the property was abandoned.

The " mine " was actual a pit less than 40m across if I recall right.

Every thing I can find on this region says small pockets of high purity graphite, but nothing significant to provide any sustainable supply.

However I wish you good luck in your venture