Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: helo4 who wrote (4674)	3/4/2016 12:17:44 PM
From: Thiess - ZEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

"Glad I'm on the sidelines" ROFLMAO - So is Chiefy.

To: helo4 who wrote (4674)	3/4/2016 12:53:59 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	Respond to of 12350

Message #4674 from helo4 at 3/4/2016 12:15:05 PM No measured, only inferred for graphite. And this graphite is only found in veins and pods. How much time and money will it take to get the company's graphite into a 'measured and indicated' category while chasing veins across its vast property. I guess this is where the 'rolling resource' applies. Glad I'm on the sidelines "How much time and money will it take to get the company's graphite into a 'measured and indicated' category while chasing veins across its vast property." BINGO!....you got that right Helo. That is the key issue with the Miller property. There is a reason why the Miller property has been passed over by prospectors and promoters for more than 100 years and I think that reason is related directly to the small vein structure and economic viability. The veins are encased in solid marble so marble extraction is not an option. It must be done. The big question is "to market" graphite cost and is there enough net profit available to make a graphite mining operation financially viable.