SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (925210)3/11/2016 1:05:47 AM
From: 2MAR$1 Recommendation

Recommended By
loantech

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570706
 
And you do really live in a weird weird world all bunched up by fantasies. None of this is new you know, the attacks 1972 Munich Olympics, the many hijackings & of course decade later 1983 Beirut barracks bombings under Reagan admin that makes Benghazzi look like a nat.

Too bad Reagan didn't have a Middle East policy, so many marines lost to that blunderous stupidity

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=30491322&srchtxt=beiruit

Beiruit Lebanon, Caspar Weinberger on how we hung 241 marines out to die..(.you people have a funny way of making true, real history disappear , overlay a make believe world ontop.)
In 2002, the Presidential Oral History Program at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center of Public Affairs interviewed Caspar Weinberger about the six years (1981-1987) he spent as Ronald Reagan’s Secretary of Defense. Stephen Knott, the interviewer, asked him about the bombing of the U.S. Marines barracks in Beirut on Oct. 23, 1983, which killed 241 Marines. Here’s his answer:

Weinberger:
Well, that’s one of my saddest memories.

I was not persuasive enough to persuade the President that the Marines were there on an impossible mission. They were very lightly armed. They were not permitted to take the high ground in front of them or the flanks on either side. They had no mission except to sit at the airport, which is just like sitting in a bull’s eye. Theoretically, their presence was supposed to support the idea of disengagement and ultimate peace. I said, “They’re in a position of extraordinary danger. They have no mission. They have no capability of carrying out a mission, and they’re terribly vulnerable.” It didn’t take any gift of prophecy or anything to see how vulnerable they were. middleeast.about.com