Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LiveLife who wrote (9927)	3/11/2016 5:49:18 PM
From: explorationguy	4 Recommendations Recommended By Hog Head minder Panthergirl Theotokos Respond to of 10654

Teck will certainly have a forward looking development plan of their projects like all major resource companies. It will be tentative to some degree due to the possibility of changing metal prices, country issues etc. They have no obligation to reveal their plans to a junior partner nor would they for a number of business reasons. Some examples would be the right to maintain flexibility in their schedule, another is to keep a lid on the value of an asset they may wish to purchase and so on. CUU can certainly sell SC at any time. If there's no clear development timeline within the next 2 years, then CUU will not get anywhere near the implied value of the metal in the ground, either from Teck or any other potential buyer. You seem certain that both parties have a valuation and just need to come to an agreement. I don't know how you have arrived at that conclusion but I do know that Teck has the leverage here. They can always tell CUU that they don't know when SC will get developed and see if CUU is prepared to wait.

To: LiveLife who wrote (9927)	3/11/2016 5:51:15 PM
From: louel	1 Recommendation Recommended By Panthergirl Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10654

,now they have to come to an agreement that benefits both parties and makes them happy and to finally move this project forward. ' Absolutely a speculative false statement based on your slighted opinion that is intended to pump. Exploguy is correct in that anything binding between TECK and CUU on shaft creek is in the J/V agreement. Secondly I have read those same observations in past posts on various boards. You can try to change your ID but the character can't hide. See ya