To: Fact Czech-er who wrote (7690 ) 3/13/2016 5:09:51 PM From: Myfreedom58 2 RecommendationsRecommended By Bills16 NLWest
Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22811 Kudo's to Hoov for at least giving it a crack, I am sure some will appreciate those over most defences. But read his opening premise again. He clearly states there has to be a resource - and inferred does not mean there is a resource. Your PEA is 100% inferred, which is just not done as far as I can tell. No one can put out a PEA without an indicated resource and expect to be taken seriously Sorry - I guess my size analogy was wrong - 220 metres by 220 metres is more like a city block. You got me. . Wow, such a vast area to work in two or three years. :) Hoov - we are now in 2016 - Chief and others have been on this full bore on this since the beginning of 2014 - and immediately told us then of all the great work CCB had already done, So two to three years CCB has been plugging away in earnest at this at least. Zen was able to do drilling, provide results, do a 43-101, followed by a PEA and SEAR filing, both of which provided indicated resources, which do count - and yet CCB could not do any of that? Zen can and does defend its numbers in its PEA. CBC does not and cannot, because it has no resource. Just an inferred one. I know you all keep saying no one gets it because you are doing something no one else has done - and I agree to a point - it has indeed been a very long time since a company tried to sell anyone on a PEA that is 100% inferred. But hey, look, you all seem sold on this stock, so I'll leave you alone with your happy thoughts. It is quite clear no one comes here except those already invested in it, or in Zen, and clearly ne'er the twain shall meet. And the CCB PEA, like any joke, gets stale after a while. Good luck with your investment. .