Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: angel who wrote (1760)	12/28/1997 10:06:00 PM
From: tech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3391

angel, 1. I have stated (for about the third time now) that I am a investor in the stock. I can post what ever my views are and I am not being paid by anyone. I know you are trying really, really hard, but sorry I will correct you every time. 2. I have been trading stocks many years and I have been very successful. CSGI only makes up about 1/4 of my portfolio and I view this stock as a speculative trading stock. I have successfully traded ALYD many times (the posts are there), and I will trade CSGI the same. 3. I don't need a programming background to know that the toolset works and that all CSGI needs to do is to start announcing contacts. Ted, went down to CSGI and viewed a demo. No matter what the arguments might be about automated vs. fully automated, etc... The FACT IS THAT THE TOOLSET CAN AUTOMATICALLY FIND AND CONVERT CODE. Once CSGI start to announce projects the stock price will move. Unlike Mr. Hansen, I do care how the stock performs. 4. Next time you want to call me gullible, be sure to look at a few of your posts on the ZITL thread. I have made, and will continue to make, lost of money trading the year 2000 stocks. If you hang around, you will see how my CSGI trade turns out. 5. Make sure you don't try to post inaccurate information. This is from the S-1 >> The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD") in December 1996 advised the Company that it is conducting a routine review of trading in ConSyGen-Texas' common stock following the acquisition of ConSyGen-Arizona. The NASD made a written inquiry of the Company, to which the Company responded in writing in January 1997. << As you can clearly see that the NASD said they were doing ROUTINE REVIEW There is not an investigation as you have tried to indicate. This was over a year ago and nothing has come it. If the company felt that there was an issue here that need to be solved before applying for NASDAQ, then they would of done so. I do not feel that there is nothing in this "routine review" that would interfere with the company's listing.