Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (926097)	3/14/2016 10:48:15 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580688

What could possibly go wrong? Within hours, the account reportedly had over 500 followers, and members were already asking for “uniform suggestions.” Black shirts would be historically accurate.

To: bentway who wrote (926097)	3/14/2016 10:54:50 PM
From: zax	Respond to of 1580688

Trump supporters wants to for the "Lions Guard". Their primary purposes is for providing protection for Trump rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the members of the opposing parties, and intimidating Democrats and unionists, for instance, during the Trump's planned boycott of Macy's businesses. en.wikipedia.org

To: bentway who wrote (926097)	3/15/2016 2:10:05 AM
From: RMF	Respond to of 1580688

"Trump Militia"....I LOVE IT..... Normally at this time of year I'd be going over my NCAA picks for the tournament, but this year I seem to be more interested in the latest Republican Polling.... For a political junkie this stuff has just been FANTASTIC..... And there's about 8 more months of this.....it's the greatest gift.....

To: bentway who wrote (926097)	3/15/2016 3:01:08 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1580688

A few simple questions for climate fanatics By Jack Hellner President Obama, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton state that climate change is more dangerous to future generations than terrorism. They advocate destroying industries that have greatly improved our quality and length of life. I believe that the American people are entitled to some actual scientific facts instead of talking points. Here are some questions for the global warming bandwagon. In the 1920s, scientists were warning that because of warming and the melting ice, coastal cities would soon disappear. Why were they wrong then, and why are the same warnings correct today? How did the Earth cool so much from 1945 to 1976 that the experts were warning about a disastrous ice age if rising CO2, rapidly increasing populations, industrialization, and fossil fuels cause warming? According to UCAR (the Universal Corporation for Atmospheric Research) the temperature today is around 1.53 degrees warmer than 1880. Wouldn't that be within the margin of error, especially since the Little Ice Age ended around 1800? According to scientific studies, CO2 was much higher during the ice age – 2,000-8,000 parts per million vs. 400 today. If CO2 causes warming, why wasn't the Earth warmer then than it is today? Recently, the U.S. attorney general said the Justice Department is considering bringing legal action against people who will not go along on climate change caused by humans. Is it any wonder that scientists who are skeptics won't speak out when their livelihood is threatened? Shouldn't the media do some simple research instead of just repeating the talking points that humans cause climate change? We should all remember that science is almost never settled. There is continuous evolution in scientific thought. Why is there such a great effort to shut off debate on climate change? Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/a_few_simple_questions_for_climate_fanatics.html#ixzz42zOGIcRo Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter \| AmericanThinker on