Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (275067)	3/16/2016 1:49:37 PM
From: fastpathguru	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

The one where Elmer gets lost in his own lies... You lied with your "retroactive trades" accusation. By your logic that makes all your accusations lies Not so. You confirmed you posted false trades. Whether I point that out before or after your admission makes no difference. It does when there is a causal connection between them. Your and MM's refusal to acknowledge the legitimacy of my realtime-posted trade directly instigated the (clearly tongue-in-cheek[]) "false trades" I "admitted to." (More like "rubbed your face in.") A "retroactive trade" is a claim to have made a trade in the past without substantiation. Retroactive trades are illegitimate, and if I "made any" it was clearly[] only to prove that you couldn't acknowledge the actual realtime posted trade. Which is why you never quote them in full... Doing so would destroy your deception. Any trade substantiated with a realtime post stands on its own. To say my realtime-posted trade is somehow illegitimate is to hold me personally to a higher standard than anyone else. If you have a problem with the trade, justify it based on the trade* or STFU. fpg PS: I don't recall attaching a $$$ value to my trade, so your argument is purely academic anyways. Just like the entire concept of an "investor forum trade" anyways. What's undeniable is that AMD is significantly higher today than when I laid my marker down... And the fact that my stated AMD strategy shows credibility is your REAL problem. If AMD had gone down, you would be (and were!) singing to the mountains about my "huge losses". (See the dozens of gleeful posts celebrating my "losses" when AMD was under $2.10...)