Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cavewoman who wrote (31293)	12/29/1997 2:12:00 AM
From: michael d kugler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

I don't know too many shareholders in MSFT that are unhappy. Can you say the same about RMIL shareholders?

To: Cavewoman who wrote (31293)	12/29/1997 9:38:00 AM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

You might want to double-check your facts. This was grabbed from MSFT's web site at microsoft.com August 24, 1995: Microsoft Windows 95 is available worldwide. I can also assure you that the SEC had nothing to do with the release date. Anyway, you are comparing an apple with the fertilizer used to feed an orange tree. One more thing, it's been my experience that all Microsoft products are buggy. Most of the bugs don't occur in light usage, but try to really work one of their products and you'll inevitably run into a bug, many of which are documented at MSFT's web site. As for Windoze95 not working correctly when it was released, you're making it sound like it was an unusable product. Buggy, sure, but mostly things computer novices won't encounter. Heck, I'm a professional computer geek and am still running the copy of 95 I bought in August. Anyway, comparisons to any aspect of MSFT are pointless.