Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mannie who wrote (117339)	3/21/2016 8:30:43 PM
From: abuelita	Respond to of 218434

that's an understatement. :(

To: Mannie who wrote (117339)	3/21/2016 11:22:14 PM
From: GPS Info	3 Recommendations Recommended By abuelita Elroy Jetson ggersh Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218434

blimey. <gg> It's amazing how many incorrect statements someone can make in just one paragraph: Mannie, that opinion of yours is offensive. You comments were perfectly reasonable for polite society: an honest exchange of ideas is what these threads are for. You have no right to ask others to hold their opinions just because you disagree. We should hope for an honest exchange of ideas, and we really should work to falsify our ideas by having open and frank discussions. Some people feel that they've already done all the work necessary to answer any future questions regarding our environment. They're wrong. The following comment is clearly wrong and a misinterpretation of golfer's demand. You should not tell people they have no right to their opinion just because you disagree with them. You never stated that golfer72 didn't have a right to his opinion. golfer72 didn't offer an opinion; he told koan not to post anything regarding climate change. Telling people what they can't do is certainly not an opinion. Calling climate change crapola is an opinion. Some people simply can't read for comprehension, they just spread crapola from thread to thread. If the golfer dislikes Global Alarmist rubbish which is unscientific and a lot of off-topic con-artist swindling criminality, then it's perfectly reasonable that they tell Koan to take it to a rubbish dump, or recycling sustainability bin, elsewhere. If someone dislikes the issue of climate change, that's too bad. They can use the ban button or ask TJ for ban. If posting rubbish was a just reason for taking a discussion elsewhere, this board would shut down completely.<g> You have no right to write that! <gg> This guy's crazy. You have every right to write that!! If you don't like golfer's opinion, too bad for you. Again, there's a lack of comprehension here: The statement was an order (with please and thank you) for koan to go elsewhere. I hope you understand there are a great number of SI posters who have deluded themselves for many years. That's unlikely to change anytime soon. BTW, just to make sure I win the argument, you are a racist. One final mistake for good measure. You're not. If you have a search capability, you can see how many times this poster has been called a racist and has called others racist. This is almost his signature. Warmest regards