Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A Hard Look At Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (936)	3/28/2016 8:49:54 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 46476

6% of Ted's statements were true. So maybe he would make a good President?! politifact.com

To: longnshort who wrote (936)	3/28/2016 11:32:54 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46476

What a stretch, how do you define "immediately", for Trump supporters it must mean the moment it goes on the airwaves. Cruz denounced it less than a week after it ran. If that isn't "immediate" enough for the Trump supporting Brietbart site, too darn bad. They've been in the bag for Trump since day one. And using politifact as an objective source is laughable. Everyone knows their extreme left leaning bias by now. Except apparently Trump supporters. Edit.... That reminds me of something. I don't think anyone even saw the add, except a few Utah voters, until after the election results came in and the Donald went on his whining tirade. So, Cruz may not have even known the add existed. He's travelling a lot, preparing for speeches, on cable shows and preparing for possible debates. Therefore, he could have responded "immediately" after he found out about it, which was a day after Donald cried like big baby at the Utah election results. How much longer do you think Trump will hide from debating Ted Cruz? How afraid is the big billionaire of going one on one against Cruz in a debate?