To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (928267 ) 3/30/2016 12:19:50 AM From: Rarebird Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576340 Ten -you are quite ignorant about the origins of Pragmatism. But I'll let William James speak in his "dedication of Pragmatism: To the Memory of John Stuart Mill From whom I first learned the Pragmatic openness of Mind and Whom My Fancy Likes to Picture As Our Leader Were He Alive To-Day". William James, Pragmatism, First Meridian Printing, October, 1955 William James, the great American Pragmatist envisions John Stuart Mill, the great Utilitarian as the leader of Pragmatism. Ten - You know chit about pragmatism and its relation to utilitarianism. Moreover, you are chit, ignorant chit, rigid, inflexible ideological chit. Your ignorance has been chosen by you because you are a rigid inflexible ideologue. <<just because you say that the American worker should have "greater consideration" than the worker in China is meaningless. You actually need to come up with a pragmatic solution to the fundamental problem, which is that the Chinese worker will produce just as much as the American worker for much less.>> First of all, dumbo, I don't have to come up with anything. I am merely stating (in my own words) Donald Trumps sentiment in regard to this matter, which I happen to agree with. Now I don't mean to insult you or break your bubble, but your views do not represent the holy of hollies and are not absolutely correct and completely verified. You are so completely FOS and are lying to yourself because you are a rigid inflexible ideologue. Whether or not "the Chinese worker will produce just as much as the American worker for much less" is irrelevant. Yes, I am saying irrelevant. It's irrelevant because the allegiance and sentiment are based on improving the income of the American worker. That comes first. Meaning: America comes first. Americans come first. And I like that about Trump very much. Now you don't like that because you are a rigid inflexible ideologue who only accepts things which conform to your ideology. I understand why it is meaningless to you. But that does not make it meaningless per se. <<dodging of my questions.>> I am NOT dodging your questions. If you want proofs, that involves Metaphysics and I am quite adept at offering proofs up in that realm. However, politics is nothing else but expressions of allegiances, sentiments and values. Clearly, you don't like that or approve of that because you are a rigid inflexible ideologue who is caught up in the realm of political correctness. That is to say, you think you know when in fact you know chit. I don't propose to possess absolute truth like you in the realm of politics. I let my love for the human all to human determine my way and political views. You like it, fine. You don't, Tough Chit. I am a Liberal in many ways and like a number of things about Donald Trump. That's why I am going to vote for him if he runs against Hillary Clinton. And if you don't approve of my sentiments, GFY, you piece of chit.