SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DRBES who wrote (27277)12/29/1997 1:17:00 PM
From: StockMan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574136
 
Re -- AMD is no longer producing 166's in any significant numbers.

This could mean either almost all of AMD's production is 233's (seems unlikely) or that the 166's and 200's are produced but junked (this would lower the real yields still further).

Seems to me that there is something fishy with AMD's .35u production process.

Stockman



To: DRBES who wrote (27277)12/29/1997 1:25:00 PM
From: Buckwheat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574136
 
DRBES,, Thanks,

"AMD is no longer producing 166's in any significant numbers"

this is exactly the "assumption" I would arrive at also after comparing market prices. I don't understand the question raised earlier (yesterday) on the thread about "what AMD plans to do with those 166s and 200s". It would appear that someone else has made the assumption that AMD is drowning in them.

Buckwheat


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News