SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (190606)4/4/2016 12:01:25 PM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
GROUND ZERO™

  Respond to of 224748
 
GOP Voters Still Support Trump’s Muslim Ban

in Politics
FacebookTwitterEmail thisShareThis

Related Articles



Sign up for free daily updates



Monday, April 04, 2016

Support remains high and unchanged among Republicans for GOP front-runner Donald Trump’s controversial proposal to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the United States.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 67% of Likely Republican Voters favor a temporary ban on all Muslims entering the United States until the federal government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists from coming here. Just 23% are opposed, while 10% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

This is unchanged from early December when Trump first made the proposal following the terrorist massacre in San Bernardino, California. His plan drew the condemnation of President Obama, many in the media, virtually all of his political opponents and even some politicians abroad.

Among all likely voters, 45% still favor Trump’s plan, while 42% are opposed. This compares to 46% and 40% respectively in the previous survey. Twelve percent (12%) of these voters are now undecided.

Most voters (54%) continue to believe it is too easy for foreigners to legally enter the United States, although that’s down from 59% in December. Only nine percent (9%) think it’s too hard to enter this country legally, while 30% believe the level of difficulty is about right.

Among voters who say it’s too easy, 69% favor the temporary ban on Muslims entering the country. Voters who believe it’s too hard to legally enter the United States or say the level of difficulty is appropriate are strongly opposed to Trump’s plan.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on March 30-31, 2016 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

A recent government report says that over 500,000 visitors to the United States overstayed their legal visas last year and didn’t go home. Most voters think those who overstay their visas are a serious national security threat and that the feds need to take stronger steps to deport them.

Republicans (73%) are more than twice as likely as Democrats (35%) to think it is too easy for foreigners to legally enter this country. Fifty-four percent (54%) of voters not affiliated with either major party agree.

Only 27% of Democrats favor the proposed temporary ban on admitting Muslims to this country; 60% are opposed. Unaffiliated voters are evenly divided.

Few voters in any demographic category believe it is too hard to enter the United States legally. But those under 40 aren’t nearly as convinced as their elders are that it’s too easy. These younger voters are also far more likely to oppose Trump’s proposed Muslim ban.

Whites and blacks feel more strongly than other minority voters that it is too easy to get into this country legally.

Seventy-eight percent (78%) of all voters have a favorable opinion of immigrants who work hard, support their family and pursue the American Dream, but only 55% believe that’s what most immigrants have in mind these days.

Sixty percent (60%) oppose the settling of Syrian refugees in the state where they live. Seventy-seven percent (77%) are concerned that giving thousands of Syrians asylum poses a national security risk to the United States.

Sixty percent (60%) believe the United States is at war with radical Islamic terrorism. However, 50% think the federal government does not focus enough on the threat of domestic Islamic terrorism.

Most Americans consider it likely that there will be a Brussels-like terrorist attack here within the next year. But do Americans think the United States can ever be made completely safe from terrorist attacks?



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (190606)4/4/2016 12:07:36 PM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™
locogringo
Sedohr Nod

  Respond to of 224748
 
Panama Papers: huge tax leak exposes Putin aides, world leaders


AFP
4 hrs ago


SHARE

TWEET

SHARE

EMAIL





EU begins shipping migrants in Greece back to Turkey




Wave of suicide attacks kill at least 29 people across Iraq







Replay Video





Play Pause

Seek

00:00
00:55

i
Volume Volume
Volume Mute Unmute

CC

SETTINGS
OFF

HQ

HD
HQ
SD
LO

Full Screen Exit Full Screen

Play Pause

Volume Volume



One of the biggest document leaks in history snared world leaders, celebrities and sports stars in a snowballing worldwide scandal Monday over their secretive offshore financial dealings.

A year-long worldwide media investigation into a trove of 11.5 million documents, leaked from a Panama-based law firm with offices in 35 countries, exposed a tangle of confidential financial dealings by the elite, from aides of Russian President Vladimir Putin to relatives of Chinese President Xi Jinping, sports celebrities and screen stars.

The vast stash of records from legal firm Mossack Fonseca, the so-called Panama Papers, was obtained from an anonymous source by German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung and shared with more than 100 media groups by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ).

Offshore financial dealings are not illegal in themselves but may be abused to hide assets from tax authorities, launder the proceeds of criminal activities or conceal misappropriated or politically inconvenient wealth.

© Maxim Zmeyev/REUTERS File photo of Russian President Putin attending his annual end-of-year news conference in Moscow. - Putin aides implicated -

Among the biggest findings of the media probe, which fingered about 140 political figures including 12 current or former heads of state:

-- Banks, companies and close associates of Putin, who is not himself named in the documents, "secretly shuffled as much as $2 billion through banks and shadow companies", according to the ICIJ. These allegations were not aired by Russian state TV.

-- The families of some of China's top communist brass -- including the nation's president -- used offshore tax havens to conceal their fortunes. At least eight current or former members of the Politburo Standing Committee, the ruling Communist Party's most powerful body, have been implicated.

-- A member of FIFA's ethics committee, Juan Pedro Damiani, had business ties with three men indicted in a corruption scandal. Argentine football great Lionel Messi and his father are named as owners of a Panama company, Mega Star Enterprises, that has not previously been disclosed in a Spanish tax probe into their affairs. UEFA chief Michel Platini used Mossack Fonseca to administer an offshore company, but he denied wrongdoing in a statement to AFP.

-- A Panamanian shell company may have helped hide millions of dollars from the Brink's-Mat heist, a $40 million British gold bullion robbery at London-Heathrow Airport in November 1983 that is etched in criminal folklore. The Panamanian law firm denies this allegations, however, the ICIJ said.

-- Iceland's Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson secretly owned millions of dollars of bank bonds during his country's financial crisis when the country's financial system collapsed and banks had to be bailed out. The irritated premier denied wrongdoing in a television interview, which he cut short, but faces calls to resign and a no-confidence vote in parliament this week.

- Three of Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's four children -- Maryam, who has been tipped to be his political successor; Hasan and Hussain -- were named as owners of London real estate through offshore entities. But Sharif's son Hussain told Pakistani television: "There is nothing wrong with it and I have never concealed them, nor do I need to do that."

© Provided by AFP Chinese President Xi Jinping has been dogged by foreign media reports of great family wealth - 'Nothing wrong with it' -

The Panama Papers, from around 214,000 offshore entities covering almost 40 years, also name the president of Ukraine and the king of Saudi Arabia, as well as sporting and movie stars including Jackie Chan.

At least 33 people and companies listed in the documents were blacklisted by the US government for wrongdoing, including dealings with North Korea and Iran, as well as Lebanon's Islamist group Hezbollah, the ICIJ said.

President Francois Hollande promised Monday that French tax authorities will investigate the disclosures of the Panama Papers and that legal proceedings will follow. Australia said it, too, had launched a probe into 800 wealthy Mossack Fonseca clients.

"I think the leak will prove to be probably the biggest blow the offshore world has ever taken because of the extent of the documents," said ICIJ director Gerard Ryle.

One of the Panama law firm's founders, Ramon Fonseca, told AFP the leaks were "a crime, a felony" and "an attack on Panama".

"Certain countries don't like it that we are so competitive in attracting companies," he said.

Panama's government said it had "zero tolerance" for any shady deals, and vowed to "vigorously cooperate" with any legal investigations.

- 'Biggest leak in history' -

The massive leak of documents recalls Wikileaks' exploits of 2010 -- which included the release of secret military files and diplomatic cables.

However, in terms of size, "the 'Panama Papers' is likely the biggest leak of inside information in history," according to ICIJ.

More than 500 banks, their subsidiaries and branches have worked with Mossack Fonseca since the 1970s to help clients manage offshore companies. UBS set up more than 1,100 and HSBC and its affiliates created more than 2,300.

The documents show "banks, law firms and other offshore players often fail to follow legal requirements to make sure clients are not involved in criminal enterprises, tax dodging or political corruption," the ICIJ said.

Mossack Fonseca is already subject to investigations in Germany and Brazil, where it is part of a huge money laundering probe that has threatened to topple the current government.