SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mighty_Mezz who wrote (8000)12/29/1997 2:33:00 PM
From: Jack Zahran  Respond to of 31646
 
>> Business week checks in:

Nice post David, according to BusinessWeek companies will be spending more $$$ in 2001 on Y2K issues than they will in 98 and 99!

businessweek.com



To: Mighty_Mezz who wrote (8000)12/29/1997 3:07:00 PM
From: Starduster  Respond to of 31646
 
David,
This was teriffic! Nice find! Sandie



To: Mighty_Mezz who wrote (8000)12/29/1997 5:18:00 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
External vs. Internal Spending...

A fascinating chart in BW. The increase in y2k spending increases after 2000 rather than declines.

However, the chart implies that the Gartner estimates are WAY WAY OFF.
That chart also implies that the majority of y2k spending will be with normally budgeted IT dollars and internal staff.

Implications for investing? Alot of companies will be hurt on the bottom line because of all this time and money spent on fixing old code. Y2k systems integrators, at least the better known ones like KEA, CPWR, ISLI, CHRZ and IMRS should do fine in 1998, but the dollar pie is much smaller than I imagined.

Alternatively, we could question the source for that chart. How did the writer come by those estimates? What kind of assumptions did the chartmaker have when projecting y2k outsourcing into 1998 and beyond?

Today I bought more TPRO, TSK and CPWR. Y2k investors are going to have one helluva year.

DocStone