SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PKRBKR who wrote (930560)4/15/2016 12:25:36 PM
From: zax  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576793
 
Paypal.

You are angry Pickens isn't getting grand subsidies? How un-conservative of you.

The collapse of the natural gas market cost him his investments in wind power and did in his wind plans.

Ironically, if visionary Musk helps improve battery technology and reduce production costs as he promises, it could make wind power much more attractive.



To: PKRBKR who wrote (930560)4/23/2016 6:54:42 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576793
 
Um, lets see. I'd say Tesla. While subsidies help, they are still profitable without them. And SpaceX. The only subsidy I am aware of is for the Dragon2 capsule. Which isn't flying yet. And then there is SolarCity. Like the fossil fuel industry, the subsidies are nice, but not required for profitability. I mean Exxon gets a variety of subsidies and tax breaks. Do you want to claim they wouldn't exist without them?