Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (931112)	4/19/2016 1:11:08 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573904

"Comparing historical charts released over time should be done more." Perhaps deniers should compare them in scientific publications, instead of in self-published comic books. PNAS authors, editors, and reviewers come from around the globe. Submissions are accepted from all researchers. Authors do not need to have a connection to an NAS member to publish in PNAS. More than three-quarters of published papers are submitted directly to PNAS, not Contributed papers by NAS members. pnas.org

To: Brumar89 who wrote (931112)	4/19/2016 10:03:54 PM
From: RMF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573904

It's not just a "theory" that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and it's not just a "theory" that CO2 has increased dramatically in the Earth's atmosphere in the last 250 years. It's also not just a "theory" that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere continues to increase. The only "unsubstantiated" "theories" are being put out by global warming deniers who theorize that even if the earth is warming it's must be caused by something else rather than CO2. This argument by the deniers is like the arguments of the Flat Earthers in the early 2nd millenium when they said the earth couldn't be round because people weren't falling off. When you think about it, their argument was MUCH better than the global warming deniers.