Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tech who wrote (3877)	12/29/1997 7:53:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10786

Nope. I skipped over nothing that would change the fact that, despite one and half months of you wrongly claiming otherwise, reg D shares are still dilutive. Frankly, I suspect reg D shares will still be dilutive one and a half months from now. - Jeff P.S. This is my last post on this subject. If you plan to pursue the issue for another one and a half months then please use a link so we know it is a rehash of old stuff. Here's an example of a link to a post about old stuff there's no use discussing further: 207.183.153.206

To: tech who wrote (3877)	12/29/1997 9:08:00 PM
From: feltburner	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10786

For the sake of others on this thread, I believe we can conclude the argument of Reg S vs. Reg D by agreeing that, when used to raise money for the firm, both methods increase the # of fully-diluted shrs; further, of the two, the Reg D offering would be more preferable to existing shareholders. Now, however, we have your latest favorite argument: Gruder slapped shareholders in the face by paying $6mm to Chase for Chase's interest in the joint venture. Alydaar Europe has more contracts than your favorite company has worldwide. If that's not worth $6mm for Chase's interest, what do you think CSGI is currently worth? -Felt Burner