Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A Hard Look At Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (2087)	4/23/2016 3:23:40 PM
From: ByGoneYrs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46827

You kill me Bruce!

To: Brumar89 who wrote (2087)	4/24/2016 10:10:08 AM
From: simplicity	1 Recommendation Recommended By Brumar89 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46827

Dopey Donnie knows he'd be out of his depth. I know what you're saying, but I'm not so sure he knows that, Bruce. I think he truly believes that repeating the same worn-out phrases (about 'making American great again', 'winning so much that we are going to be tired of winning', 'building a wall and making Mexico pay for it', etc.) will continue to work with the American electorate ... even if he is sitting on stage with someone who is capable of pointing out the shallow, meaningless nature of those phrases, while also offering real policy positions and real plans to get the government out of the way of job creation, maintain our sovereignty, and defeat our enemies. Trouble is Donald doesn't realize that much of his support has come from democrats in the open primaries -- people who want to see him nominated so that, once he is, the mainstream media can begin their full frontal assault, unveiling the less appealing underbelly of the candidate that they have conveniently kept under wraps, and which will suddenly become important, beginning July 22nd. Events, personal connections, and behaviors from Trump's past (those that are fact-based, and surely many that are magnified all out of rational proportion) will be headline news for months ... while the media will simultaneously see to it that Hillary's many crimes (ranging from her stint at the Rose Law Firm, to her involvement in the Watergate investigation, to her White House years, to Benghazi, to her private server, and everything in between) will remain cloud-covered and ambiguous, at best, to the low-information voter. And that LIV will walk into the voting booth in November willing to vote for someone whose reputation is 'questionable' over someone the media have, for three-plus months, consistently painted with a detail-oriented broad, black brush.