To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (58136 ) 4/25/2016 12:09:47 PM From: John Pitera Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 71442 Hi PM: We may want to get familiarized with the names of large numbers.en.wikipedia.org This article lists and discusses the usage and derivation of names of large numbers , together with their possible extensions. The following table lists those names of large numbers that are found in many English dictionaries and thus have a special claim to being "real words". The "Traditional British" values shown are unused in American English and are becoming rare in British English, but their other-language variants are dominant in many non-English-speaking areas, including continental Europe and Spanish -speaking countries in Latin America ; see Long and short scales . English also has many words, such as "zillion", used informally to mean large but unspecified amounts; see indefinite and fictitious numbers . Standard dictionary numbers[ edit ]Name Short scale (U.S., some parts of Canada, and modern British) Long scale (continental Europe, older British, and some parts of Canada)AuthoritiesAHD4 [1] CED [2] COD [3] OED2 [4] OEDnew [5] RHD2 [6] SOED3 [7] W3 [8] UM [9] Million 106 106 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Milliard 109 ? ? ? ? ? ? Billion 109 1012 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Trillion 1012 1018 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Quadrillion 1015 1024 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Quintillion 1018 1030 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Sextillion 1021 1036 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Septillion 1024 1042 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Octillion 1027 1048 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Nonillion 1030 1054 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Decillion 1033 1060 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Undecillion 1036 1066 ? ? ? ? ? Duodecillion 1039 1072 ? ? ? ? ? Tredecillion 1042 1078 ? ? ? ? ? Quattuordecillion 1045 1084 ? ? ? ? Quindecillion 1048 1090 ? ? ? ? ? Sexdecillion (Sedecillion) 1051 1096 ? ? ? ? ? Septendecillion 1054 10102 ? ? ? ? ? Octodecillion 1057 10108 ? ? ? ? ? Novemdecillion (Novendecillion) 1060 10114 ? ? ? ? ? Vigintillion 1063 10120 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Centillion 10303 10600 ? ? ? ? ? ?
Apart from million , the words in this list ending with -illion are all derived by adding prefixes (bi -, tri -, etc., derived from Latin) to the stem -illion . [10] Centillion [11] appears to be the highest name ending in -"illion" that is included in these dictionaries. Trigintillion , often cited as a word in discussions of names of large numbers, is not included in any of them, nor are any of the names that can easily be created by extending the naming pattern (unvigintillion , duovigintillion , duoquinquagintillion , etc.). NameValueAuthoritiesAHD4CEDCODOED2OEDnewRHD2SOED3W3UMAll of the dictionaries included googol and googolplex , generally crediting it to the Kasner and Newman book and to Kasner's nephew. None include any higher names in the googol family (googolduplex, etc.). The Oxford English Dictionary comments that googol andgoogolplex are "not in formal mathematical use". Usage of names of large numbers[ edit ]Some names of large numbers, such as million , billion , and trillion , have real referents in human experience, and are encountered in many contexts. At times, the names of large numbers have been forced into common usage as a result of hyperinflation . The highest numerical value banknote ever printed was a note for 1 sextillion pengo (10 21 or 1 milliard bilpengo as printed ) printed in Hungary in 1946. In 2009, Zimbabwe printed a 100 trillion (1014) Zimbabwean dollar note, which at the time of printing was worth about US$30. [12] Names of larger numbers, however, have a tenuous, artificial existence, rarely found outside definitions, lists, and discussions of the ways in which large numbers are named. Even well-established names like sextillion are rarely used, since in the contexts of science, astronomy, and engineering, where such large numbers often occur, they are nearly always written using scientific notation . In this notation, powers of ten are expressed as 10 with a numeric superscript, e.g., "The X-ray emission of the radio galaxy is1.3×1045 ergs." When a number such as 1045 needs to be referred to in words, it is simply read out: "ten to the forty-fifth". This is just as easy to say, easier to understand, and less ambiguous than "quattuordecillion", which means something different in the long scale and the short scale.