Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (31465)	12/29/1997 10:15:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

That's twisted piffle and you know it.

To: michael d kugler who wrote (31465)	12/29/1997 10:19:00 PM
From: FTJoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Okay - so you believe she understood full well that pugs was calling you a criminal. Then that is why you posted the insult, and an insult it was, no mistaking for an expression that has some other meaning. Ellen has now stated she believed it was being used as an expression, that is, it's non-literal use. So you may as well call her a liar also I guess. Of course, the question still stands why you couldn't be man enough to say "Ellen, you know damn well what pugs means" instead of resorting to the name calling(note, it is no "expression" that has some other meaning). Basically you are saying you decided to insult Ellen because you BELIEVED she understood that pugs was calling you a criminal. Do you think she deserved that, she didn't call you anything. Be a man, apologize, and take it up with pugs.