SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Hard Look At Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (2300)5/1/2016 3:40:31 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
Ben Smith
Investor Clouseau

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 47603
 
Huh? Pete Wilson endorses Cruz for excellent reason:

"The next president of the U.S. will have as many as five Supreme Court vacancies in his or her first term. We know what kind of justices Hillary Clinton would nominate. Heaven knows what justices Donald Trump would pick. What we can know is that Ted Cruz will choose judges who will interpret the law and not legislate it," Wilson said.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pete-wilson-endorses-cruz-hes-not-anti-immigration-hardly-anti-latino/article/2590025



To: longnshort who wrote (2300)5/1/2016 3:48:29 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 47603
 
I'm expecting Whiny Donny will demand to be pronounced the nominee without a vote taken. He knows once a vote is taken, he immediately will lose delegates so he can't afford to let a vote be taken.

I also expect he'll bribe either Kasich or Rubio to become his VP and try to pretend their delegates are his. Unfortunately, that isn't true. Delegates bound to either Kasich or Rubio can only vote for Kasich or Rubio on the first ballot.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News