Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : IVAX Insider Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 5,17,37,5,101,... who wrote (371)	12/29/1997 11:36:00 PM
From: flickerful	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 756

jackson. that line bugged the ___ out of me. and the napro bath... well, sure, it was completely overdone ... what else ? what truly sticks in my mind, however: i hear the blurb about "tentative" approval on cnbc, and i flash immediately to the "tales of ir, or jaffee shrugged". and then , i hear the remarks cited in the article and attributed to "our man jaffee" aka "oh they lost money?". bristol myers, ya gotta love em. they raise spy vs spy to high industrial art. and jaffe, well boris badenuff would go for frosty but jaffee, where is emma peel when you need her... jaffee would fall to moose or squirrel. so we never had a chance. an amendment ? ,/b> i don't think that would do it... i prefer to imagine we have not yet fully played out our hand. not just yet, and not entirely. dream on. randy