Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zax who wrote (934013)	5/8/2016 2:42:39 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576973

>> The most admired woman in the US, some 20 years running If you admire her, please tell me what for. >> Your opinion on the server is both wrong and worthless, and the story is soon dead - the FBI after a lengthy and thorough investigation will find neither wrongdoing nor compromise. No knowledgeable IT person would make that claim.

To: zax who wrote (934013)	5/9/2016 9:04:54 AM
From: jlallen	18 Recommendations Recommended By Alan Smithee Bill Bonefish Brumar89 d[-_-]b and 13 more members Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576973

The Clinton camp has been spinning the law involved in her email scandal situation most likely to put pressure on the FBI not to make a referral and to give cover to AG Lynch not to indict....However the law is clear....the extent to which a person such as Mrs. Clinton intended to remove classified documents is irrelevant. All that matters as far as establishing legal culpability is whether Mrs. Clinton, by virtue of her official position, came into possession of classified information and then affirmatively removed the information to an unauthorized location (i.e., the lying hag's private server). Whether she knew or suspected the information was classified is irrelevant. By that standard, if honestly observed, she is toast......