Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David R. Schaller who wrote (8294)	12/30/1997 11:15:00 PM
From: Don craig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

Dave: It helps a lot, thank you very much. Your right I remember now, it was the strike length and not the resource that increased by 38%. If the numbers regarding RC vs DD are accurate, and they based this on the whole resource, I would think we could get a dramatic increase from that alone. Never mind the more drilling that has ocurred since the last calculation. Do you think we could read into anything regarding the twinning of the 12 RC holes? I cannot see them doing this, without knowing that it would be well worth it. I would think this kind of work is done, after you have established an economic Ore body. What do you think? If they were strictly drilling on an exploration basis only, why would they spend the extra money going over something they have drilled already. They must like what they have seen thus far. Good Luck Don PS: How do you get to the question and answer form?