Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: clean86 who wrote (60249)	5/12/2016 6:16:13 PM
From: SiliconAlley	Respond to of 60323

I'm confused by your reference to "last warning." I'm not aware of any previous warnings from you, so if there have been any, I would appreciate if you would provide a reference to the message number where you issued a warning. If a private message, it is not in my inbox, and I would appreciate a copy. I'm sorry that you confuse debate with "bickering." I have pointed out fallacies in arguments. The most recent thread, related to the possibility of Unisplendour purchasing a 15% position on the open market, is on point to this board, as it would have a substantial effect on the supply and demand of this stock. I have attempted to keep the debate on topic, and have provided valuable information as it relates to CFIUS and foreign purchasers of U.S. stocks. Where I come from, this is called "providing factual information" and "setting the record straight," not bickering. If you wish this board to be one where people cannot take opposing views, and challenge others to support their view, you might consider adding that to the description of this board. Otherwise, you should not expect conjecture to go unchallenged. Debate is what helps distinguish fact from fiction. I personally find it offensive that the other participant continues with anti-Chinese rhetoric, unsupported by fact or law, and believe if there are any warnings to be issued, they should be directed toward this kind of behavior.

To: clean86 who wrote (60249)	5/12/2016 6:49:43 PM
From: Sam	7 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Greg Hull JCnieuwenj joncon63 oldbeachlvr and 2 more members Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 60323

Clean, I really disagree with that. You are cutting off pretty much the only dialogue that has been on this board for a long time. If people don't like what S.A. has to say, they can ignore him. If he didn't post, there would be virtually no posts at all (counting Art's responses). It isn't up to you to decide which posts are acceptable as long as the tone of the posts isn't bullying or rude. There has always repetition on this thread without the people repeating themselves getting banned. Just because you don't like what they are saying or find it annoying means nothing.