Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mongo2116 who wrote (935361)	5/16/2016 7:47:08 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576330

It could go either way depending on the situation. In neither case is there anything resembling a seizure. and you do have rights in a contract you spent man hours and dollars on The employees who sign the contract has rights under it, rights pertaining to the counterpart in the negotiation, the company. Not against other potential employees who don't want to join the club that negotiated the agreement. Also those rights aren't property rights, but contract rights. If there was a violation of the contract it wouldn't be a seizure it would be a breech of contract. The third party (new potential employee who doesn't want to join the union) didn't sign a contract with the union.