Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: david1951 who wrote (190660)	5/20/2016 8:53:29 AM
From: slacker711	4 Recommendations Recommended By david1951 HerbVic pyslent Zen Dollar Round Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213182

I know surveys shows that people value their privacy but when the rubber hits the road, I think they tend to buy/use the products that perform best....privacy be damned. I love Google Photos. theverge.com First Click: Do you trust Google to always be listening inside your Home? May 20th, 2016 By Thomas Ricker on May 20, 2016 07:30 am @Trixxy 15 Share on Facebook (88) Tweet Share (4) Pin (2) I want privacy. Deep down I know it’s important, so much so that on my home continent of Europe it’s a fundamental right. I’m just not very good at safeguarding it. A year ago, right after Google I/O 2015, I was struggling with the idea of migrating to the just announced Google Photos in exchange for “free” unlimited storage. I use scare quotes because I’m fully aware that I’m the product in this transaction. Nevertheless, I tested it for a few months, slowly adding more and more photos until I eventually pulled the trigger and committed to the service — as have 200 million other people. Now, thanks to Google I/O 2016, I’m faced with a new conundrum: Google Home. Do I really trust Google enough to place its data gathering appliance in my living room, where it’ll always be on and always be listening? THE RISK IS THEORETICAL, THE BENEFIT IS REAL I still have my reservations with Google Photos, but the service is so damn good compared to everything else in its class that I’m willing to risk exposure in exchange for the value I receive. After all, the risk is theoretical, but the benefit of using the service is real. It’s just that now I’m at Google’s mercy to secure my photos from hacks, and to not use them, or the data it gleans, in nefarious ways. I'm sure I'll rationalize the purchase of an AI-driven personal assistant in the same way. You may argue that Android and iOS phones are already listening, patiently waiting for an "Okay, Google" or "Hey Siri" to kick into action. But phones are personal and not equipped with powerful microphone arrays and far-field voice recognition technology. While my phone can pick up my voice when it’s nearby and not inside my pocket or bag, Google Home, or Amazon’s Echo for that matter, can pick up conversations from anywhere in the room, even with my wife and kids. And once hooked, the companies want us to place their mics in every room of the house. It all sounds so ominous. Right now it’s only Amazon and Google who've built such sophisticated personal assistants for the home. But Microsoft’s Kinect is also listening, as are Samsung TVs. And how long before Apple and Microsoft offer their own personal assistants for Siri and Cortana? Hell, even Sonos is looking to get in on the action. Personally, I think I'll wait to see what Apple and Sonos do since I'm already living inside that ecosystem. But what about you? When the day comes that you willingly place internet-attached microphones into every room of the house, which company will you trust with the responsibility?