SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zax who wrote (935983)5/20/2016 11:40:23 AM
From: locogringo1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576611
 
Trump’s income tax returns once became public. They showed he didn’t pay a cent.

If true, that's just like you and the other babyish freeloaders on this thread, so what's the problem?



To: zax who wrote (935983)5/20/2016 12:02:22 PM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Respond to of 1576611
 
LOL!!!

Legal tax avoidance is as American as apple pie....its only morons who buy this crap...



To: zax who wrote (935983)5/20/2016 12:10:46 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
jlallen

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576611
 
OOPS! It looks like your conclusions were 100% WRONG again. (surprise surprise)

The Uninsured Rate Falls, But Does ObamaCare Deserve The Credit?


<snip>

"But a closer look at the data show that the drop in the ranks of the uninsured had little to do with ObamaCare’s subsidies for private insurance, and almost everything to do with skyrocketing enrollment in Medicaid, the government program for the poor.

First, keep in mind that the 9.1% figure includes seniors on Medicare. Given the aging of the population, increased enrollment in Medicare would have pushed the uninsured rate down somewhat, even without ObamaCare. For those under age 65, the uninsured rate was 10.5% last year, and for those 18-64, the rate is 12.8%, the CDC data show."

<more>

investors.com



To: zax who wrote (935983)5/20/2016 12:31:00 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 1576611
 
and Clintons stash their cash is the tax dodging "Clinton Foundation" so they can avoid taxes…

your point is?



To: zax who wrote (935983)5/20/2016 12:36:37 PM
From: Broken_Clock1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1576611
 
Anti-Gun Boxer: My Armed Security Saved Me From Bernie Voters


Senator praises her private security while eradicating your gun rights

Kit Daniels
Prison Planet.com
May 19, 2016

Anti-gun Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said she was “fortunate” she had armed security to save her from Bernie Sanders supporters.

Credit: yashmori / Flickr

Boxer was at the Nev. State Democratic Party’s 2016 State Convention when Bernie voters disrupted the event on Saturday.

“It was a scary situation,” Boxer told CNN on Wednesday. “I was there… It was frightening.”

“I had — I was on the stage and people were six feet away from me and if I didn’t have a lot of security, I don’t know what would have happened.”

In other words, she’s bragging about her private security as she eradicates the Second Amendment rights of millions of Americans who can’t afford that luxury.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Boxer is the very definition of hypocrisy, but this isn’t the first time she made such a stupid statement.

For example, it was only a day after the San Bernardino Massacre that Boxer claimed gun control “works.”

“The fact is, sensible gun laws work, and we’ve proven it in California,” she said after two radicalized Muslims killed 14 people despite the state’s strict gun laws.

Her claim runs contrary to a Justice Dept. study revealing that, over the past several decades, serious violent crimes have decreased as gun ownership increased.



And there’s been a significant decline in gun-related violent crimes since the mid-1990s when numerous states began passing concealed carry laws.

In comparison, Chicago, Ill., banned all handguns in 1982 with few exceptions, resulting in a 40% increase in murders as killers took advantage of defenseless victims.



Boxer won’t let reality derail her agenda, however.

She also wanted to ban magazines holding more than 10 rounds, which make up the majority of all pistol magazines, as well as ban so-called “assault rifles” which are little more than semi-automatic rifles.

But nearly five times as many murders are committed with knives than so-called “assault rifles,” according to the FBI.

FBI crime statistics revealed that out of 11,961 murders performed within the U.S. in 2014, 660 were committed unarmed, 1,567 were committed with knives and only 248 murders were known to have been committed using rifles of any type, including single-shot long arms and “assault rifles” routinely demonized by gun control groups.

And, although the FBI did list 2,052 murders under “unknown firearm type,” but given the percentages of the known firearm categories, it is unlikely that more than four percent of the “unknown firearms” were in fact rifles, and less than that were semi-automatics.



To: zax who wrote (935983)5/20/2016 12:39:43 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Respond to of 1576611
 
What if a person loses $20,000 one year and makes $20,000 the next? Are you going to require him to pay tax on $20,000 just because there is a December 31 in between? Does that seem fair to you?