Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayne J. who wrote (1397)	12/30/1997 3:26:00 PM
From: D LEE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6654

Wayne, Is there really any need for a reverse split? Candidly, I don't recall much mention of it here, but if so, it's in the collection of concerned remarks: Message 3036378 and the follow up conclusion: Message 3036398 I think reverse split is an idle tool, serving no purpose for CVIA, I could be wrong, but if not; as Jack Arnold's interest is in harmony with those on this thread, he will avoid the need for using it. To all readers: - If I am wrong: Can anyone give reference to any documented statements of why reverse split might be considered necessary, or if perhaps Jack has mentioned the possibility himself? or if it might be part of coming NASDAQ BB requirements? Sometimes reverse split works exactly the way it's supposed to, but "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"! I agree with you, Wayne. One more day till the party. - & I guarantee you !! (I'll be asleep) Happy New Year! And, Hey Everybody! - - How about that Wayne! Dave