To: Rarebird who wrote (27253 ) 12/30/1997 1:09:00 PM From: Peter V Read Replies (3) | Respond to
Rarebird, my post wasn't directed at you, but this one is. Your endless rantings don't impress anyone, long or short. We are all well aware of your position on CUBE right now, just as we were well aware of your position on Andy Chen a few months back. We obtained this awareness from your first few posts. We did not need the endless rantings and ravings against Andy then, nor do we need endless posts by you now.
Jay k's post was very even. He did not personally attack anyone, as you did recently with John Rieman, and previously with Andy Chen. Jay k posted his TA in a very neutral, non-antagonistic manner. My "thank you" to Jay k was for the manner of that post. I did not say anything about my position on CUBE.
You, however, took my simple "thank you" and attacked me for being, in your words, "hopeless and extremely close-minded." How you could have determined that I am these things from a simple "thank you" is beyond me, unless you are clairvoyant, which BillyG has suggested you may think you are.
I was rather annoyed with you several months ago when you called me naive, and I'm pretty pissed off at you now. You have your opinions, and I accept those posts where you express them about CUBE . No one on this or any other thread, however, needs your opinions about individuals. These threads are intended to be a forum for discussions about stocks , and not for personally attacking the individuals presenting those discussions.
I look forward to posts that provide some news or thought-provoking analysis, and I thank you for some of your past posts that have presented such material. However, I could certainly do without the numerous times you post material that is nothing but a rant and rave about CUBE or the others that post to this thread. We are well aware of your position here. There is no need to repeat it endlessly without providing any substance.
