Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (936769)	5/25/2016 12:24:35 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574852

Given the black market, it might not prevent any shootings. OTH, it might cause a would-be terrorist to attempt to purchase weapons on the black market from an undercover agent, instead of from a dealer.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (936769)	5/25/2016 1:39:36 PM
From: gronieel2	1 Recommendation Recommended By SeachRE Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574852

*...Would that law have helped prevent the San Bernardino shooting?...* and what about enforcing all the gun laws already on the books Tenny? We shouldn't have any guns laws at all. You gottem? Pack'em! An armed society is a free society. Like Chuck Heston said as they pried the gun from his cold dead fingers so they could fit him in the casket. Speeding laws are an infringement and murder should be a civil matter. Spousal abuse and child endangerment are a family matters best settled at home. A marriage is defined by God and only white people should be allowed to vote if that's what the majority decides.