Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (70393)	6/4/2016 12:15:34 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86350

Everyone isn't like you Eric. You shouldn't use your rich rural self with money to waste as a guide to what regular people will like. <Only takes a couple seconds to plug in and it's virtually 100% efficient. Induction charging is only 90% efficient at best. But I like the V2G aspect that will rule going forward. Cordless charging is ok for some aspects but it's inefficient and slow.> In London for example, nearly everyone is parked on the street. Chargers are on the footpath or people run a cable from the house. I have put photos in here. It's very inconvenient to have to get the cables out. It's also hazardous and expensive having those big charging machines sitting on the footpath. A lady will not want to be plugging a stupid car in when it's raining after she has had her hair done and when she has arms full of shopping and children. Ladies will love their TTTT SSSS with Halo. And don't be dishonest and slippery with facts. Halo is almost as good as cable in efficiency at about 94%. Cable = depends on the cable and car. The extra cost is about 20c to use halo instead of a cable. People don't want much hassle to save 20c. Meanwhile, Ricardo is signed up for Halo. qualcomm.com Ricardo is an impressive organisation. ricardo.com They used to provide BP Oil with consultancy services. Visiting them was fascinating. Mqurice

To: Eric who wrote (70393)	6/4/2016 4:13:53 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86350

Dear anonymous fountain of bovine excrement eRICO clearly you know no science as you don't even comprehend what science is. And at it's atomic level chemical energy is electric energy from electrons and the energy of fossil fuels came from photon energy. All cars today are already electric at the atomic level. And future cars will run on the same electric energy as technology uses the Sun's photons converted to fossil fuel precursors using the good CO2 in the atmosphere that is making such natural capture more and more efficient. Fuels of high energy density and low weight that are not prone to spontaneously melting down. Your supposed science was a speculated application of an equation that ignores reality. The proof the equation was stupidly applied and false comes in the prediction of the atmospheric warm spot that does not exist. Just as in the picture below the spontaneous outgassing orders of magnitude greater then the entire rest of the inner surface of a glass, The few molecules of CO2 will remit and photons verses the aerosols in the atmosphere. And as H20 in the air increases the air is less dense and it rises cools and forms aerosol ice crystals and they are .96 emitters. But nothing will suppress old fartfull and his geyser of bovine excrement.