Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bart13 who wrote (119930)	6/7/2016 4:41:39 AM
From: Snowshoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219862

>> It's sure possible that polynyas are what allowed the sub to surface in open water in 1958-9 at the North Pole, but what proof do you have that the Arctic wasn't melting at the time too? I'm also unaware of any polynyas that were as large as the area apparently covered by the ship in the 1921 article. not that it isn't possible. And I don't think we read the same 1921 article, it was rather on the gloom and doomey side to me. << Bart, I'm not going to spend much time defending Koan from your rebuttals to his "settled science". If anyone cares to Google your specific talking points, they can find arguments pro and con. Meanwhile I'm watching Koan's pack ice to see if it melts away, and Mq's sunspots to see if we get another Little Ice Age. I'm also watching the alternative technology coming down the pike, like Tesla's new net-zero-energy battery factory. -Snow