Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bart13 who wrote (119934)	6/7/2016 3:31:26 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217551

I did not miss the posts, I found them meaningless. In the debate about whether AGW is real or not, the highest probability for being correct is to simply take a poll of the top atmospheric scientists in the world. The climate deniers have used many tricks to distort that opinion by including scientists who were not as qualified to make that determination as others. As well, the most valid studies that have been examined on the subject are well over 90% in support of AGW. That 97% that's been bandied around, or whether it's 90%, or even 85 or 80%, nevertheless the vast majority of the top atmospheric scientists in the world believe in AGW. And anybody that thinks they can figure out this stuff better than they is being foolish.