Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (600639)	6/9/2016 5:36:44 PM
From: Maurice Winn	5 Recommendations Recommended By AJ Muckenfus alanrs Follies Kaena™ unclewest Respond to of 793912

Should Hillary be indicted? Obama and the Democrats in their totally "unbiased" way dictate to the FBI and other arms of government "NO!" The government issues instructions to stand down and not indict or even interview or otherwise harass. Should Trump be indicted? The Mexican Raza anti-wall anti-Trump judge says in a totally "unbiased" way "YES!" Sotomayor, the Supreme Court judge, says that being a woman and being a Raza means coming to different decisions because of her race and her missing Y chromosome. The Mexican Raza anti-wall anti-Trump judge has the same excellent Raza qualifications and with Sotomayor's backing, he's on pretty safe judicial ground. This is banana republic stuff and Donald Trump knows it and is right about the Mexican judge. The Mexican judge should be stood down and replaced by somebody who does not have such racist and biased animus. Once again, regular people can see that Trump is reasonable to challenge the prejudiced Mexican judge. Mqurice