Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mongo2116 who wrote (939376)	6/11/2016 8:33:34 PM
From: Crony	1 Recommendation Recommended By jlallen Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574758

Gosh.. You say the QE ended but the deficit have been going down. Do you realize this is still deficit. Where the money is coming from to cover this deficit? Who cares if QE ended but they created another way to print money. The point is they are still printing it. I am not arguing here about Bush. My question was : is it a sound policy to run budget deficit year after year? Yes or no? If you say 'yes' - then why not print 5 trillion a year? 10 trillion? The stock market would go to da moon. So the answer must be 'no'. In which case - you should not claim it is Obama's sound economic policies caused this current mildly positive situation. It is just simple printing money which is not a sound long term strategy. But short tem it of course works and ignorant idiots have a bunch of talking points about good stock market and smart democrats who create all the good economic growths and evil republicans that cause all the recessions.