Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (27335)	12/30/1997 7:16:00 PM
From: Profits	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1585202

StockMoron, re: <I have mentioned that in order to do that, they have tweaked their process so that its now a poor .35u process.> What the hell are you talking about? Do you have any clue whatsoever? Do you know anything about process technology? What industry do you work in? What are your credentials to be talking about process technology? I think that your brain is tweaked! Processes are tweaked by Intel, by AMD, by every semiconductor manufacturer in the world until they get the recipe just right to optimize speed distribution and yields. What exactly did AMD do to their process so that "it's now a poor .35u process? Tell me please. Would you? As I said earlier, you don't know jack! Profits

To: StockMan who wrote (27335)	12/31/1997 12:58:00 AM
From: greg nus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1585202

Stockman, Again you present yourself a s a candidate for Albert's School for Fools. I suggest you read the lehman report with scrutiny. It says AMD who was ahead of Intel in conversion to 100% .25u process may take thre more months than planned. Meanwhile Intel claims to now be equal. Well if I was behind in the ocnversion process I'd say I was equal too. It't a cheap shot at buying time for the team behind ment to deter your customers to wait for you to release, in stead of buying from your competitor.... and appease your nervous stockholders who have already bitten off all their fingernails. It also hepls to piant a rosy picture to the analist to avoid the possibility of a downgrade. In this case the lehman guy bought the story. Maybe the fact that he also is a stockholder and Lehman is an Intel marketmaker have just a little something to do with his objectivity. You know jsut like your have lost yours regarding Intel and AMD. Of coarse losing all that money in Intel is understandable. But only to a point. Otherwise you'll have to take the man part off your nonicure.