SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael d kugler who wrote (31742)12/30/1997 9:13:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 55532
 
Mike,

He was being somewhat aggressive on IRC the other night as well.
Unfortunate.... :0| Misplaced anger, but understandable as I have been there myself.

I have a sense that the SEC "did" approach RMIL with Kid's Glove, as indicated by postings that they had "visited" the company's offices on a fact-finding mission well before the eventual trading halt.

The fact that the misrepresentative (fraudulent?) press releases were out for so long before the SEC finally halted the stock would lead a logical person to believe that wanted an air-tight case before moving forward.

I may be wrong. But then again, I may be right. For the innocents who believed in the wild claims of the Cartel Ringleaders, I hope that I'm wrong. I really do. I would like to think that this company is just "misunderstood" and has the potential that Riley, Pugs, and Shades seem to believe it has.

Mtnres... I have been there, and I have also felt anger towards the SEC for acting in a way that I thought rash. However, they have a role to play and their understaffed, overworked, and I think they are finally coming to grips with how much of a "Wild West" really exists here on the Internet. And it explains my view on self-policing activities by Nay-Sayers, solicited or not. Since they can't do it, all of us have to.

Mike, you have brought some invaluable information to light about RMIL and its operations and I give you credit for your diligence.

We all have our reasons for being here, and until proven otherwise, I will continue to believe you are here for the same reasons that I am, and not as an agent of some interested party in this stock.

Regards,

Ron



To: michael d kugler who wrote (31742)12/30/1997 11:15:00 PM
From: mtnres  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Why should I be anquished? If the Government claims they are doing something for my best interest, I want to know why. They seemed a little vague on their reasoning. If they could tell me this stock sucks and give me specifics, I would truely appreciate it. When they halt MY stock in MY best interest, I would like some specific reasons. Since when has the Government been in the business of making people think and what qualifies them to tell me what is in the best interest of me and my money; don't they do what they want with the 50% of my money they take in taxes, now they want to control the other half? No thank you, if that's the way they want to play, I will start to recognize my Irish citizenship. Their fault for that too, born on the US Navy base in Londonderry (before it closed).