Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zax who wrote (941749)	6/21/2016 1:59:28 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574096

The Hillary Clinton e-mail ‘scandal’ that isn’t They've got nothing to run ON, so, all they can do is to baseless-ly attack the opposition.

To: zax who wrote (941749)	6/21/2016 2:04:57 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1574096

Talk about delusions!!! LMAO!!!

To: zax who wrote (941749)	6/21/2016 2:21:09 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574096

Zax, I disagree with the Washington Post opinion piece on two key points: - Back-channel communications are inevitable. People unknowingly do it all the time. - Hillary says she did not "knowingly" transmit classified info using her private e-mail server; therefore she cannot be convicted of a crime. The first point is no excuse for criminal behavior. Otherwise why have security protocols at all? The second is typical of Clintonian logic. How many times has she testified that "she doesn't recall" why she broke the law? Besides, she went through a LOT of trouble to set up a private e-mail server, and not just for the sake of convenience. It is generally accepted that she was deliberately avoiding the rules regarding record-keeping. Generally the left is saying, "Yes, she broke the law, but she did not commit a crime." Which is perhaps the most self-serving logical fallacy I have ever seen from the Hillary camp. Tenchusatsu