Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (942266)	6/23/2016 12:54:22 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Recommended By PKRBKR TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574753

Prosecuting Alarmists Posted on June 22, 2016 by tonyheller Democrats say that lying about the climate is not protected speech, which puts an entire $29 billion per year industry of paid climate alarmists at risk. For example, this sea level story is 100% fraudulent. San Francisco’s global warming price tag could be $77 billion – San Francisco Business Times It is based on this story, which says San Francisco “could be underwater” Then it says San Francisco “will be underwater” In 100 Years, $77 Billion Worth Of San Francisco Property Could Be Underwater \| Co.Exist \| ideas + impact Actual data shows that the study is scientifically baseless. Sea level in the San Francisco Bay shows little or no change over the past 75 years. Sea Level Trends – State Selection Other Northern California tide gauges show sea level falling. Sea Level Trends – State Selection There is no scientific basis for the claims in these sort of articles. These are paid fraudsters who are intentionally misinforming the public. If Democrats want to prosecute climate fraud, the fraudsters are right under their nose and on their payroll.