Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (191260)	6/26/2016 10:37:29 AM
From: teevee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233783

In hindsight, what signalled that "leave" would win is the size of the bets for "stay" versus "leave". The bet size for "stay" was much larger, and it took many more ""leave" bets to balance the books. This is not unusual in a betting situation where you are betting the outcome of a game or sporting event, but in a voting situation, where the number of betters on the "leave" side is much larger than on the "stay" side, should have made the outcome more clear, at least to me.