SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (943249)6/27/2016 8:32:09 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575980
 
Poor Old Low Energy Hillary Can’t Walk the Gay Pride Walk

Posted at 9:00 am on June 27, 2016 by Dan Spencer

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, center, marches in the New York City Pride Parade in New York, Sunday, June 26, 2016. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Hillary Clinton tried to score some LGBT political points by trying to march in New York City's annual gay pride parade Sunday afternoon. The headlines in the biased media wing of the Democrats' Party were all filled with glee over Hillary's "surprise" appearance in the parade. But the real surprise is that poor old Hillary didn't have the energy to walk the gay pride march. A ccording to the New York Times, Low energy Hillary only lasted about 15 minutes and "four blocks or so" before being "hustled into a waiting vehicle."

That's right only four of the thirty-something blocks of the parade route:



Makes one wonder whether Hillary is too low energy to withstand the rigors of the presidency.

Clinton skipped the parade last year, sending her daughter, Chelsea Clinton, as a surrogate. The last time Hillary marched in the city’s Pride Parade was a decade ago, during her 2006 Senate reelection campaign.

http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2016/06/27/poor-old-low-energy-hillary-cant-walk-gay-pride-walk/




To: Brumar89 who wrote (943249)6/27/2016 8:33:24 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575980
 
even though the law’s purpose was to ensure the health and safety of the mother.
That was total bullsh-t and you know it......