Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (303166)	6/27/2016 11:43:12 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541849

It really is amazing how the RW is distorting what is going on with these cases against Exxon. They present it as a "free speech being denied" case, as though every company has the right to distort what their own research says about its main product. If a drug company marketed a drug that they knew was in fact harmful, would it be illegal to deny them the right to claim that it was not harmful? I suppose it isn't surprising. They certainly denied that tobacco was harmful long after that was established.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (303166)	6/28/2016 10:05:14 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541849

>> Do you mind his serial climate lies? He's very dishonest. Yes, but I will have to read his article first before I decide if he is dishonest, misinformed, or simply has different perspective than I. The other day I was thinking about how people like Lindy Bill define "conservative" as anyone who agrees with them and liberal as anyone who opposes them. That's stupid and self-serving. I am not going to do that.