SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (944000)6/30/2016 11:55:16 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577162
 
They were required but unnecessary.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (944000)6/30/2016 11:55:31 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577162
 
Feds: Spreading Wrong Information About Idaho Rape Case Could Violate Law
If possible, the case of the 5-year-old girl sexually assaulted evidently by three Islamic “refugee” boys who had been seeded in Idaho has become even more alarming.

The girl was attacked in Twin Falls by boys aged 7, 10, and 14, from Iraqi and Sudanese families. Beyond that, we don’t know much. The authorities tend to throw shrouds of secrecy and/or deception over the misdeeds of the Muslims they have been importing. In this case, withholding some information is appropriate because the suspects are minors.

The lack of solid information has inevitably resulted in the spread of rumors, many of them false.

The authorities have reacted to these rumors like a maniac trying to kill mosquitoes with a flamethrower. From an official statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Idaho:

The spread of false information or inflammatory or threatening statements about the perpetrators or the crime itself reduces public safety and may violate federal law. We have seen time and again that the spread of falsehoods about refugees divides our communities.

Eugene Volokh makes an interesting point:

Imagine that there was an allegation of an unnamed white police officer sexually assaulting a young girl, and imagine that there were stories — even highly inaccurate ones — circulating online accusing the police department of covering up the assault, which led to threats to local government officials. And imagine that a U.S. attorney in the Bush administration made a public statement saying, among other things, that “We have seen time and again that the spread of falsehoods about police officers divides our communities,” and that “The spread of false information or inflammatory or threatening statements about the police officer or the crime itself reduces public safety and may violate federal law.”

There would be riots. The media would report on nothing else.

If spreading false information about refugees involved in raping American girls violates federal law, federal law needs to be changed. You stamp out falsehoods with truth, not jackboots. Otherwise it is the truth that ends up getting stamped out. Meanwhile, as people become ever more distrustful of the official line, wild rumors will continue to flourish.


Censorship is not the solution

http://moonbattery.com/?p=73766