Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zax who wrote (945321)	7/6/2016 4:07:21 PM
From: Broken_Clock	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo tntpal Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586776

then why all the other prosecutions for the same offense by the Obama DOJ? are you saying that the Obama DOJ has prosecuted others unfairly? Message 30649532 All of these decisions point to a flawed and corrupt system that permits transgressions at the highest level of government, while the government pursues those at a lower level. President Barack Obama’s legacy will include the fact that he irresponsibly used the Espionage Act of 1917 more often than all previous presidents over the past 100 years, and contributed to the demise of the Office of the Inspector General throughout the government, particularly at the CIA. One of the key causes of the current hostility and cynicism toward politicians and the process of politics is the double standard at the highest levels of government.

To: zax who wrote (945321)	7/6/2016 4:09:19 PM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Recommended By Honey_Bee Respond to of 1586776

No reasonable prosecutor would pursue any charges against Clinton. Several reasonable prosecutors including Joe Degenova and Rudy Guilani have said that is nonsense....

To: zax who wrote (945321)	7/6/2016 4:13:45 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By Fiscally Conservative Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586776

Zax, No reasonable prosecutor would pursue any charges against Clinton. They would for anyone else except Hillary Clinton. Tenchusatsu

To: zax who wrote (945321)	7/6/2016 4:31:33 PM
From: Bonefish	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB jlallen Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586776

Plenty would line up to do it. It's really a dereliction of duty NOT to do it.

To: zax who wrote (945321)	7/6/2016 4:37:13 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1586776

Just for you, Zax, so you can claim, "But, but, it's DIFFERENT!" Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Materials Tenchusatsu

To: zax who wrote (945321)	7/6/2016 4:47:55 PM
From: locogringo	6 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Honey_Bee jlallen John Old Boothby and 1 more member Respond to of 1586776

No reasonable prosecutor would pursue any charges against Clinton. THAT COULD NOT CONCLUDE WITH A CONVICTION. NOBODY was going to convict a former 1st lady of a living president. Not going to happen. Testimony would lead to obama, and NOBODY on the republican side has any nerve to go there, or the resulting impeachment talk in an election year. She belongs in jail, but NOBODY can put her there. Why go any further when nothing is going to happen? My opinion of Comey has done a 180. He put it all out in the open. It's up to the voters and Trump to decide her future. Got any new polls for me yet?