Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (945575)	7/7/2016 4:15:55 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575173

>>>Anyone can see the huge disconnect between his criticism of the e-mail scandal and his decision not to recommend charges. We need to be focused on "his criticism of the e-mail scandal" rather than on his "decision not to recommend charges." He spent something like 14 minutes on his criticism and only 1 minute on his decision.....get it?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (945575)	7/7/2016 5:41:08 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575173

He took great pains to point out that she did nothing criminal. Like he did when he spoke before Congress. Because, you know, he can't really recommend charges without something to charge for. I know, I know. The legal system is crap. Democrats should be chargeable regardless if they actually broke any laws. Which one of your rules of partisanship is that again? Surprisingly, he did spend a lot of time giving his own opinions. Exactly why he took that unusual step is up for speculation. Because his opinions are not really relevant.