Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. (GRNO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Meany who wrote (8351)	12/31/1997 9:47:00 AM
From: Charles A. King	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13091

Robert, maybe some people could benefit from a visit to Charleston besides just checking on GRNO. charleston.net Charles

To: Robert Meany who wrote (8351)	12/31/1997 10:25:00 AM
From: John Brockman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13091

Robert I too emailed the Webmistress last night requesting a review of Zeev's breech of the terms of using SI. Just for info here are the reasons for removal from SI: "The following actions . . ." Well, after reading reason #3, here is the link. exchange2000.com The terms list 4 reasons for removal but the caveat is after the words "The following actions" are the words "among others" which gives leeway to the webmistress to sanction members for what I hope are egregious posts. As far as Riley, I think the Webmistress should monitor that thread and take whatever action is necessaary to keep the personal attacks and other character assinations under control. I am not against disagreements between posters, but state your opinions and your reasons you disagree with the other persons in a mature manner without the character assinations and innuendos. Let the readers decide which side to put their faith, and sometimes money. Sometimes we must agree to disagree. BTW, my pet peeve that I have seen happen on the RMIL thread, if you want to send a messgage for an individual for only their benefit to respond to their post, do it by email. That is one reason why we provide our email addresses. If you post your message on SI instead, don't come back and complain that your post was for so and so because someone else read it and responded and disagreed with your analysis or conclusion. Every "bagholder" of GRNO, Have a Very Happy New Year!! John PS - Riley, since you probably search SI on key words like RMIL (and Riley), I find it hard to believe that RMIL will trade again the day after the 10 day suspension. The company has to file certain papers with the SEC and with MMs, NASD and MMs must get the OK from the SEC to trade the stock on the bulletin board (however it may trade on the pinks), and MMs must be willing to make a market in the stock. Some of this bureaucratic process takes more time than 10 days. Read the GRNO posts from May 97 through August, we've been there, done that. Personnaly, I don't think this stock will trade again before July 4, 1998, except maybe on the pinks. If this company is for real, get ready for a news blackout from management as they get their affairs in order and respond to the SEC. Good luck