SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (946286)7/10/2016 10:56:09 PM
From: Bonefish  Respond to of 1576890
 
I tell you what. Let's just agree that there are better and much more dedicated sniper rifles than an ar15. With much greater range...
but for the Dallas shooter it would have worked well because the distances weren't that great.
otoh, a vintage, 1940s soviet sks carbine was used. Not classified as an assault weapon.



To: combjelly who wrote (946286)7/10/2016 11:48:40 PM
From: d[-_-]b1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jlallen

  Respond to of 1576890
 
Or are you going to claim that the optical sight and the bipod is what pumped up the price of that rifle to $2200?

It's rather typical to spend the same amount of money for the optic as the rifle. I have several $1000+ scopes, better scopes can easily go for $2200+ alone. Real sniper scopes like a Leupold Mark 8 or Schmidt & Bender can go for over $4000.

ads.midwayusa.com

ads.midwayusa.com

Bi-pod - $100 or so.



To: combjelly who wrote (946286)7/10/2016 11:54:29 PM
From: d[-_-]b1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576890
 
The standard barrel is 16". Even if I didn't know this, why would that ad make a special effort to point out that it has one that is 20"?

That's just it - you don't know.

Standard AR15 is 20", but most buyers are looking for the 16" M4 carbine (copy) today, not the "standard rifle".
Just like 20/30 round magazines are also standard issue capacities - not high capacity.



To: combjelly who wrote (946286)7/11/2016 12:10:27 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1576890